![]() ![]() We’ll then have a near back JMP that will take us in the middle of the NOPSLED. POP POP RET will redirect us 4 bytes before RET where we will place a short JMP taking us 5 bytes back. The difference is that this time we can put our shellcode into the first part of the buffer following a schema like the following: | NOPSLED | SHELLCODE | NEARJMP | SHORTJMP | RET (3 Bytes) | msfpescan -p surgemail.exeįortunately this time we have a further attack approach to try in the form of a partial overwrite, overflowing SEH with only the 3 lowest significant bytes of the return address. However, searching for a suitable return address in surgemail.exe, obviously leads us to the previously encountered problem, all the addresses have a null byte. usr/share/metasploit-framework/tools/pattern_create.rb 684E3368 11000 10360ĭebugging our exploit code | Metasploit UnleashedĪs it often happens in SEH overflow attacks, we now need to find a POP POP RET (other sequences are good as well as explained in “Defeating the Stack Based Buffer Overflow Prevention Mechanism of Microsoft Windows 2003 Server” Litchfield 2003) address in order to redirect the execution flow to our buffer. This causes our SEH to be overwritten by 0圆84E3368 and based on the value returned by pattern_offset.rb, we can determine that the bytes that overwrite our exception handler are the next four bytes 10361, 10362, 10363, 10364. So for our needs, we will call the function and replace our fuzzed variable with fuzzed = Rex::Text.pattern_create(11000). So we see that we call the pattern_create function which will take at most two parameters, the size of the buffer we are looking to create and an optional second parameter giving us some control of the contents of the buffer. # Maximum permutations reached, but we need more dataīuf = buf * (length / _f).ceil def self.pattern_create(length, sets = )īuf > converge_sets(sets, 0, offsets, length) ![]() If we look at the source, we can see how this function is called. Rather than calling the command line pattern_create.rb, we will call the underlying API directly from our fuzzer using Rex::Text.pattern_create(). By running pattern_create.rb, the script will generate a string composed of unique patterns that we can use to replace our sequence of ‘A’s.Įxploit Code Example: /usr/share/metasploit-framework/tools/pattern_create.rb 11000Īa0Aa1Aa2Aa3Aa4Aa5Aa6Aa7Aa8Aa9Ab0Ab1Ab2Ab3Ab4Ab5Ab6Ab7Ab8Ab9Ac0AĬ1Ac2Ac3Ac4Ac5Ac6Ac7Ac8Ac9Ad0Ad1Ad2Ad3Ad4Ad5Ad6Ad7Ad8Ad9Ae0Ae1Ae2Īe3Ae4Ae5Ae6Ae7Ae8Ae9Af0Af1Af2Af3Af4Af5Af6Af7Af8Af9Ag0Ag1Ag2Ag3Ag4Ag5.Īfter we have successfully overwritten EIP or SEH (or whatever register you are aiming for), we must take note of the value contained in the register and feed this value to pattern_offset.rb to determine at which point in the random string the value appears. ![]() Both of these scripts are located in Metasploit’s tools directory. Fortunately, Metasploit comes to the rescue with two very useful utilities: pattern_create.rb and pattern_offset.rb. We now need to determine the correct offset in order get code execution. It seems that host is not responding anymore and this is G00D )įinding our Exploit using a debugger | Metasploit Unleashed Controlling Execution Flow 0002 LIST () /"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABBBBCCCC" "PWNED" Sending fuzzed data, buffer length = 1012 Authenticating as test with password test. We can go ahead and rebuild our buffer (fuzzed = “A”*1004 + “B”*4 + “C”*4) to confirm that the execution flow is redirectable through a JMP ESP address as a ret. At the end of that effort we found that we could overwrite EIP, making ESP the only register pointing to a memory location under our control (4 bytes after our return address). Previously we looked at Fuzzing an IMAP server in the Simple IMAP Fuzzer section. Security Operations for Beginners (SOC-100).Exploit Development Prerequisites (EXP-100).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |